Is autographing a bible an act of desecration?

I’m no celebrity – not even close – but I have been asked to autograph someone’s bible before.

On a few occasions.

In certain church circles it’s actually a thing to get people to sign your bible.

I recoiled the first time it happened. It seemed like desecration to add my pathetic signature to the pages of the Holy Bible. And when I demurred, the person looked genuinely hurt. They couldn’t seem to understand why I wouldn’t do it. I guess they figured it was a weird cultural thing that Australians have with not autographing the Good Book.

But actually, Australians have their own version of Good Book signing in the so-called Fleet Bible, which was brought to Sydney Cove on the first fleet of colonizers to arrive on our shores in 1788. Rather strangely, it has been signed by every monarch to visit Australia in the past century, including Charles and Diana, Will and Kate, Queen Elizabeth and her uncle, the short-lived Edward VIII, who abdicated to marry American divorcee Wallis Simpson.

I just don’t get it. I really don’t.

Why is it considered appropriate to have celebrities scrawl their names on an ancient holy book?

I mean, isn’t it kinda, um, desecration?

This question was reignited last week when President Donald Trump signed a bunch of bibles at an Alabama church service for survivors of a recent tornado outbreak.

There was a lot of outrage on social media about the presumptuousness of the president signing a bible. But as I said, even I’ve been asked to do it. It’s not that weird in places like Alabama. And no doubt, the tornado survivors took some comfort from it.

Of course, for every social media reaction there’s an equal and oppositely reactive reaction, so Fox News’ Pete Hegseth has announced he has a new ambition—for Trump to sign his own Bible.

“Like me, do you have a new life goal? My new life goal is President Trump signs a Bible that I own,” he said. “I’m going to work on that… I’m just saying, what in the world is wrong with this? Faith is so important, its central to so many people’s lives. You go through a tragedy, the president of the United States is there, he signs it—good for you.”

But it’s not only reactive Fox commentators who haven’t got a problem with it. Dr Hershael York from the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, is cool with it too.

“Though we don’t have a national faith, there is faith in our nation, and so it’s not at all surprising that people would have politicians sign their Bibles,” he said. “Those Bibles are meaningful to them and apparently these politicians are, too.”

Ed Stetzer, head of the Billy Graham School of Evangelism at Wheaton College, tweeted, “The Bible autograph news is a made up controversy. In some places, particularly the south, people ask you to sign their bible. I’ve signed several. Most have other signatures already on the same page. Media friends, jut b/c @POTUS does a thing does not make it disrespectful.”

Yeah, so having a president sign a bible in a time of national tragedy isn’t the worst thing in the world. I mean, imagine the greater outrage if he’d refused a survivor’s request.


But back to bible-signing in general, Hershael York said that he, personally, would not ask a politician to sign a bible, but that he has been asked to sign bibles after he preaches. It feels awkward, he said, but he doesn’t refuse.

“If it’s meaningful to them to have signatures in their Bible, I’m willing to do that,” he said.

Others don’t agree.

Rev. Dr. Kevin Cassiday-Maloney, pastor at the First Congregational United Church of Christ in Fargo, North Dakota, commenting on the Trump bible-signing, said, “It just felt like hubris It almost felt like a desecration of the holy book to put his signature on the front writ large, literally.”


That word can mean different things.

If by desecration you mean disrespectful, contemptuous, or destructive, then, I think it’s clear Mr Trump was being none of those things when he signed those bibles.

But if that term is used to refer to the act of depriving something of its sacred character, then I think there are some grounds for suggesting that occurs when a bible is autographed.


Take the Fleet Bible, for instance. It sits in a glass case in St Philips Anglican Church, Sydney. It’s no longer a bible. It’s a museum piece. People don’t read it to hear the Word of the Lord. They gawk at it to see Princess Diana’s signature. Surely, it has in some measure been deprived of its sacred character.

Likewise, the Trump-signed bibles, still in their plastic wrapping. They will never be unsheathed. Their pages will never be cracked open. They may even be sold on eBay (are you listening, Pete Hegseth?). They have become a piece of presidential memorabilia not the sacred writings many people believe them to be.

I’m sure people will respond by telling me that God’s word is not limited to paper and ink. There’s nothing sacred about the Zondervan editions Mr Trump signed. Fair point. But the way we treat objects that represent higher and more sacred ideas reflects in some way on those ideas.

I remember being in a church when a youth pastor read from the bible and then dropped the book gently onto the floor to free his hands while he preached. A woman near to me gasped audibly. I asked her about it later and she told me she was a Muslim convert to Christianity and in her old world the sacred book, the Quran, could never be placed on the floor where people’s feet walked. It was sacrilege.

“I’m still getting used to how Christians treat the bible,” she smiled.

I’m not proposing we worship the paper-and-ink bible as a sacred object. Most of us read our bibles on phones and tablets these days and it’s hard to imagine considering an iPhone as a sacred object. And I’m not that worried about Trump signing bibles.

But I am worried that many Christians don’t even think through what the sacred character of the bible is, and how to hold it dearly and protectively in a world where it seems nothing is sacred and everything serves a culture of celebrity worship.



Share to:

Subscribe to my blog


The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the official views of Morling College or its affiliates and partners.

Latest Blogs

Picturing the Resurrection

The best paintings of the resurrection don’t include Jesus in them. At least it seems that way. Seven years ago (was it really that long??)

The Perfect Ash Wednesday Picture

What an eccentric painting this is. Carl Spitzweg’s 1860 painting Ash Wednesday depicts a clown, dressed presumably for Mardi Gras, languishing in a dark and

The Fierce Mother Heart of God

My three-year-old grandson Jarrah has been unwell recently. Really unwell. He has been seriously ill with what we’ve now discovered was a horrible combination of

11 thoughts on “Is autographing a bible an act of desecration?

  1. Great post Michael with thoughtful reflections and suggestions

    1. Woah, an affirmation from Angelo G?!?! Give me a minute to recover. 😉

      1. OK
        Minutes up! :^P :^)

    2. Here’s how you respond: I’m not worthy to sign your Bible. No one is. My signature is meaningless in the Kingdom of God. You cannot worship God and man.

  2. Just as I was formulating a comment about the sacredness of our religious text I read exactly the point I was going to make – for Muslims if a Quran touches the ground it is no longer able to be used – it has to be either buried respectfully or burned – it can’t be pulped or recycled or shredded as if it ere just some ordinary book. We Christians I think have lost a great deal of respect for our holy texts – where ever you fall on the continuum of ‘human words used by God’ to God’s words recorded by humans’ there is one thing that we can’t deny – our scriptures have the power to change the very course of human lives and history!

    Does that mean we shouldn’t’ get our Bibles signed? I don’t think so, for many doing so actually makes the book even more valuable to them as an encouragement and inspiration.

    If writing on a bible desecrates it, what then are we to make of the current trend toward creative journaling on the pages of bibles? Zondervan is getting in on the action by making extra wide margins for drawings and creative work – these do not desecrate the bible as much as make it more useful for people – getting the word deeper into our spirits.

    1. I’m gonna put marking a bible in the process of studying it in a different category to having “celebrities’ autographing it. One indicates reverence for the text. The other… well, doesn’t!

  3. Kia ora Mike, Firstly, I appreciate your blogs – they usually cause me to reflect on an issue in a new way and be better informed. However, this particular blog struck me as seemingly at odds and out of step with the theme and perspective of your other blogs and writings (the ones I have read anyway), so much so that I wondered if someone else wrote it. Maybe I am yet to fully grasp the nuance of your argument. I think Greg Colby poses an interesting question to your piece about what constitutes desecration and what is reverence, which leads to the suggestion it is potentially down to the conscience of the individual/cultural group. If one person thinks that having a celebrity sign their copy of the Bible will desecrate it then it would probably be wise for them to avoid having a celebrity sign their Bible. Your blog reminds me of your discussion around the secular and sacred in The Shaping of Things to Come (which I found profoundly helpful). I wonder how this piece fits in with that? Thanks for your writings/musings/reflections.

  4. Why? For me, that’s the question. Why would I even ask a celebrity to sign my Bible? Paul? Definitely! As to the care of my Bible, I feel a bit convicted of not treating the book itself as sacred as I should. More importantly, I feel convicted that I often don’t hold its words as sacred as I should in my heart.

  5. one thing not touched on or I missed – and forgiveness to start as I “judge” another, but there is a very real question of whether the PotUS has faith and what that faith is. We know even the demons believe . . . and shudder; and Jesus made clear you will know a tree by it’s fruit. All of which speaks to followers submitting to the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Which brings back the question who I would allow to sign my Bible. Someone of deep faith. A Saint. A Bible scholar who honors the word. My brothers and sisters in Christ who have journeyed with me in life . . .

    I have been given a Bible after my Walk to Emmaus (look it up). It was signed by all those who served me on that weekend, who showed me the love of Christ. It has value becuase those signatures represent love and community.

    Personally, I see no (very little) fruit in Donald Trump and his signing was simply hubris. And that is distasteful – a desecration – not of the Book but what the Book offers us – at its core a message of life through Jesus, signed in blood my many of his followers..

  6. […] ■ So the past week brought us the image of Donald Trump autographing Bibles. What’s up with that? Michael Frost probed the subject and didn’t look to far to find those who said Trump was desecrating Christianity’s sacred textbook. […]

    1. Yeah but those people don’t sign the cover super big with a sharpie do they? They open it to the dedication page and sign it there with the others, right? Stop trying to defend the actions of a man who simply pretends to be Christian as part of his grift. He is bad enough, don’t help him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *