It’s time to join the ceaseless celebration of the Feast of the Epiphany

According to church tradition, January 6 is the day to remember one of Jesus’ strangest encounters. It’s called the Feast of the Epiphany and it celebrates the so-called three wise men worshipping the infant Christ.

Except, we need to clear a few things up.

  1. They weren’t kings.
  2. The Bible doesn’t really call them “wise men”.
  3. And there’s no evidence there was only three of them.

There could have been a whole caravan of them for all we know. Or there might have been just two of them. Tradition has it there was three because they presented the infant Jesus with three gifts (gold, frankincense and myrrh). But their actual number is unknown.

I created a bit of a stir recently when I dared to disagree with a much-loved Christmas song, so I’m not going to trash all those Christmas carols about the three wise men/kings, but when Matthew’s Gospel refers to them it’s with the Greek word, mágos.

In ordinary usage this word means “magician” or “sorcerer,” as in, illusionist or fortune-teller, even though the KJV and RSV translates it benignly as “wise man”.

It can also refer to the priests in Zoroastrianism and the earlier religions of the western Iranians.

So, when Matthew writes that “Magi from the east came to Jerusalem” (2:1), he might have been talking about religious mystics or magicians-for-hire.


But either way, they were onto something. These strange magic men had divined the night skies, consulted their astrological charts, and arrived in Jerusalem, asking, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him” (2:2).

Many classic depictions of this scene are flamboyant, even comical, with the “three wise men” outfitted in ostentatious costumes (pantaloons, even) surrounded by camels and steeds, bearing their precious gifts with much pomp and circumstance. But the seventeenth-century Dutch painter, Leonaert Bramer captured something of its true peculiarity.

In his 1630 picture, The Adoration of the Magi, he displays the holy family and the visiting magi in various poses of shock, fear, and/or defensiveness.

While the magi look overwhelmed by their encounter with Christ, Mary and Joseph appear to be trying to repel their strange callers.

And why wouldn’t they?

The magi were pagan sorcerers to them. As Gentiles, they were unclean and therefore unable to touch Mary’s child. Furthermore, they had used some kind of Eastern magic to read the stars and find their way to the holy family’s temporary home. What good Jewish parent wouldn’t hold their arms out to bar these incongruous visitors!

I also love that Bramer uses chiaroscuro in this picture. Actually, Bramer used chiaroscuro in just about every painting he did. That was the fashion back then. But here it works perfectly.

Chiaroscuro is a painting technique using the contrast between a painting’s light and dark parts for dramatic effect and to create an illusion of depth in a flat canvas. The word itself (pronounced kee-are-oh-skoor-oh) is simply Italian for “light-dark”.

The only source of light in the picture is the infant Christ. But when we look at it we don’t think of it as a painting of a glowing baby. Bramer cleverly manipulates the source of light to provide commentary to the scene. The magi are in the dark, but they have found the source of true light, despite Jesus’ parents’ misgivings.

Like I said earlier, the church acknowledges this event on January 6 with the Feast of the Epiphany, which is the celebration of the revelation of God incarnate as Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, as the magi are the first non-Jews to worship him.

Chiaroscuro, indeed. This is a story of finding light in the darkness. The magi fall about, sinking to their knees, overawed by the presence of the one true God in the form of an infant. Mary and Joseph don’t yet fully comprehend all that their son will do. Mary knows Jesus is Israel’s promised liberator, the usurper of unjust systems, the champion of the downtrodden. But did she know that one day he would shock the Pharisees by telling them, “I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd” (Jn 10:16).

Jesus’ radical new kingdom was one in which Jews and Gentiles, men and women, the rich and poor, slaves and free, would be equal in the sight of God; equally loved, equally accepted, equally blessed. It would become a multi-ethnic, global community of love and peace.

If the Lord’s Supper was only for Jesus’ Jewish friends, the Feast of the Epiphany is for his Gentile ones; for the magi, and the Roman centurion, and the Gadarene demoniac, and the Samaritan woman, and the Canaanite mother, and the wily tax collectors. And it’s the feast for us too, Gentile followers of Christ, one and all.


I don’t think we make enough of the Feast of the Epiphany. That could be because us Gentile Christians pretty much take our access to the faith for granted, as if Christianity was always a non-Jewish religion. We need to recover the extraordinary grace of God that threw open the doors to heaven, that rent the temple curtain in two, that called sheep from other pens and invited us into this one flock under our one shepherd.

The great missiologist David Bosch once reminded us that the mission of God’s people is more than mere religious strategies and activities, when he wrote,

“The primary purpose of the [missional practices of the church] can therefore not simply be the planting of churches or the saving of souls; rather, it has to be service to the missio Dei, representing God in and over and against the world, holding up the God-child before the eyes of the world in a ceaseless celebration of the Feast of the Epiphany.”

How good a definition of mission is that — holding up the God-child before the eyes of the world in a ceaseless celebration of the Feast of the Epiphany!


This Epiphany may you celebrate the fact that our mission is all about elevating Christ and feasting with everyone who’s seen the light, even pagan magicians.

Christ is for all, everywhere. Praise him.




Share to:

Subscribe to my blog


The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the official views of Morling College or its affiliates and partners.

Latest Blogs

Picturing the Resurrection

The best paintings of the resurrection don’t include Jesus in them. At least it seems that way. Seven years ago (was it really that long??)

The Perfect Ash Wednesday Picture

What an eccentric painting this is. Carl Spitzweg’s 1860 painting Ash Wednesday depicts a clown, dressed presumably for Mardi Gras, languishing in a dark and

The Fierce Mother Heart of God

My three-year-old grandson Jarrah has been unwell recently. Really unwell. He has been seriously ill with what we’ve now discovered was a horrible combination of

7 thoughts on “It’s time to join the ceaseless celebration of the Feast of the Epiphany

  1. I love the way you use art to illustrate your ideas and thoughts, revealing the inner truths that the artist nuances in his/her work. As a once upon a time Conservative Evangelical, it is good to have theologians like you help with finding the words and idea I need to ponder the changes in and direction of my own thinking about faith.

    1. Thank you, Val. That is such an encouraging comment.

  2. Nice commentary, Mike. I frequently ponder the fact that these guys were astrologers and mystics and I like to think of the ramifications of that fact, including Jesus’ stated intent to speak to all people, whatever their birthplace, culture, belief or superstition.

    I would love to explore the likely timing of epiphany, not that it changes the meaning. I’ve heard several ideas extending up to two years after Jesus’ birth. Any thoughts on that?


    1. Interestingly, Matthew (who records the visit of the magi) begins the gospel with Jesus’ genealogy, which includes five women (if you count Mary), several of whom were Gentiles. So it’s a clear opening theme to the book. As to the timing of the magi’s visit, it is assumed it could have been up to two years after Jesus’ birth given Herod’s decision to slaughter all the male infants under two years old.

  3. Hi Michael,
    I don’t know you or your story, but I certainly enjoyed your article on the Epiphany. I found the deeper thoughts about who the”Magi” could have been as well as your discussion of light and dark in Bramer’s painting refreshing and exciting. The fact that God’s saving grace is for everyone regardless of culture, religion, language gender or anything is the best news ever!!!! Your meditation has enriched my celebration of this last week of Christmas and I am challenged to keep seeking to hold up Jesus as the only light for everyone and to pray for the salvation of everyone in my little corner of this vast universe. Thanks so much! Karen

  4. Wonderful article, Mike! I also love how you use art to examine & think deeper about the Bible & Christian elements.
    I wonder if you have ever considered branching out to other art – say, poetry.
    The only Christian poet I can think of off the top of my head is John Donne, & he’s controversial. Or Song of Solomon’s/ Song of Songs, which I don’t remember hearing a sermon on.
    Or books, & not typical Christian ones, but maybe Maedeline L’Engle’s Wrinkle in Time (Series) or her wonderful, Walking on Water.

  5. Great approach. One more thing (and it is a little thing, at least at one level). We don’t know how many gifts were brought by the magi. The gifts were made out of three substances: gold, frankincense and myrrh. Hard to imagine, given the largess of eastern generosity, that in opening their ‘treasurer chests’ (or ‘treasurers’) that only three individual gifts came out. After all, these were gifts for a king! The whole picture speaks of many gifts of gold, and many likewise of frankincense and of myrrh. It’s worth upsetting people (as nicely as possible, of course!) as I have done, in order to help people understand that scripture can be re-written’ by sentimentalized seasonal music and crèche scenes. The danger then is that we can miss the larger meaning and power of the passage so affected. Enough. Thanks again for an effective and helpful article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *