When Good Things Happen Through Bad People

Remember Rabbi Harold Kushner’s bestseller, When Bad Things Happen to Good People? In that book, he was trying to explain the great conundrum of why God allows seemingly good people to suffer. Well, this week I felt I was confronted by a similarly vexing question: why does God allow good things to happen through bad people?

Two disturbing articles got my attention. Both were about historically revered Christian leaders who turned out to be pretty depraved. So depraved in fact, it’s hard to understand how God could have used them so profoundly to enhance the lives of others.

George Whitefield – slavery advocate

George Whitefield isn’t exactly a household name these days, but he was probably the most famous American religious figure of the eighteenth century.

In the mid-1700s, he was one of the primary evangelists of the Great Awakening. A flamboyant preacher capable of commanding audiences of thousands through the sheer power of his oratory, he is said to have preached at least 18,000 times to perhaps 10 million hearers.

And yet, in a powerful article, Was George Whitefield a Christian?, Jared C. Wilson recently outlined the great evangelist’s dark history with slavery.

According to Wilson, while Whitefield initially spoke out against slave-holding, his views changed as his fame grew. He had established an orphanage in the Georgia colony and saw the great benefit in using slave labor to expand and maintain it. The only problem was that Georgia originally did not allow slavery.

Wilson wrote,

“Whitefield actually advocated for it [in Georgia]. There’s even good evidence that he brought slaves there two years before slavery was legalized! Therefore, Whitefield was not merely a slave-holder or a slavery-advocate — he was instrumental in the institution of slavery in the Georgia colony. He was complicit in this great evil.”

Martin Luther King – unfaithful husband

For decades, rumors have abounded of the FBI’s evidence of sexual infidelity by Dr Martin Luther King. No one has doubted that Dr King was unfaithful to his wife, but his indiscretions have long been viewed in light of his colossal reputation as a civil rights advocate.

That was until recently, when the FBI released a large tranche of archived material related to their investigation into King.

The archive purports to show that Martin Luther King had sexual encounters with dozens of women, including with prostitutes, that he pressured female parishioners into having sex, that he participated in orgies, and allegedly watched a fellow Baptist pastor rape a woman inside a hotel room.

While there’s good reason to doubt a “secret” FBI file, one of Dr King’s biographers, Pulitzer Prize winner, David Garrow, has read the material and reported, “I always thought there were 10-12 other women, not 40-45.”

No one can deny the extraordinary good work done by both Whitefield and King. Many people in both Britain and North America became Christians through the ministry of George Whitefield. And the rights and freedoms afforded to black Americans as a result of Dr King’s campaigns have literally changed countless lives and inspired millions around the world.

So, Does Character Just Not Matter?

In the pietistic tradition of which I’m part, it’s always assumed that a person’s character has direct bearing on their effectiveness in ministry. The more holy you were, the more God could use you for his glory. At least that’s the theory.

But the historical revelations about extremely ‘effective’ leaders continues to shake that assumption. I could regale you with stories of evangelists and megachurch pioneers using funds defrauded from followers through insurance scams and securities fraud to build their ministries, or having multiple affairs (one even faked her own kidnapping to run away with a lover), or sexually abusing or harassing women, or bullying colleagues, or accruing outrageous levels of personal wealth, and on and on.

Now, add Whitefield and King to that list.

Sexual infidelity, slave-holding, assault, fraud, bullying, mismanagement, and the loss of faith — any of these would be enough to disqualify you from holding a leadership position in a Christian church or organisation. But so many of them continued to serve in their ministries until their deaths. More than that, they remained greatly effective in those ministries.

Are we to conclude that God is no great respecter of our perceived holiness? Will he use anyone for his purposes, no matter their depravity, their immorality, or their lack of faith?

In his article on Whitefield, Jared Wilson distils some things we can learn from such revelations about great leaders. These include warnings to recognise the temptation that comes with great power, and the need to take care lest we too fall.  But he also suggests we need to develop a “hermeneutic of grace regarding history”:

“Think of how many of the sinful patriarchs — whose collective sins include adultery and sexual exploitation, abuse of power and drunkenness, even murder — are lauded for their faith. Very few heroes of the Old Testament would not be able to find their sins listed in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10… But with both Testaments testifying to both the reality of grievous sin and the reality of a great Savior, we see the grounds for reading history with a ‘hermeneutic of grace’.”

In short, no, our character isn’t some inhibitor to whether God in his grace will work through us for his purposes.

It might be true to tweet, “There is no such thing as a godly misogynist” (or slave-holder or serial adulterer), but the shocking nature of grace is that God has used such people for his glory.

The Graced and the Ungraced

Wilson isn’t whitewashing the sins of great heroes or saying our choices don’t matter. There are too many injunctions in Scripture for God’s people to be holy for him to do that. What he is saying is that God’s grace abounds in the lives of even the greatest sinners.

Last week, I heard a colleague preach on the Book of Esther, a troublesome part of the Old Testament if ever there was one.

A beautiful young Jewish exile, Hadassah is brought into the harem of the Persian King Xerxes, where she rises to prominence after the deposing of Queen Vashti. Not to put too fine a point on it, but Hadassah, renamed Esther, has to, ahem, out-perform the king’s other mistresses in order to secure her status as Xerxes’ consort. (They never taught you that in Sunday School, did they?)

What follows is a terrifying tale of palace intrigue, political machinations, threats of genocide, and, at the end, a brutal massacre followed by a feast. It reads more like an episode of Game of Thrones than part of the Bible.

And, of course, throughout it all, God’s name is never mentioned. Yahweh is simply never seen.

The closest we get to observing God’s unseen hand at work is when Esther’s guardian-cousin, Mordecai begs her to use her access to Xerxes to intervene in the impending destruction of all the Jews in Persia.

It was at Mordecai’s original suggestion that Esther has kept her Jewish identity a secret from the king. Now Mordecai insists she put herself at great risk by speaking up for her people. And he does so by using the most famous line in the Book of EstherAnd who knows but that you have come to your royal position for such a time as this?” (4:14)

Esther is a secret Jew, living in opulence as a Persian queen, having slept her way into the king’s good graces. There’s nothing in the early sections of her story that indicates any moral greatness or religious devotion. While the queen-consort isn’t a position of any influence (her lack of regular access to the king is revealed when she puts her plan in motion), she nonetheless profits from the subjugation of Persia’s peasants, including the Jewish exiles.

But her single act of advocating for her people, at great personal risk, appears to cover a multitude of past sins. Like Samson’s suicide, or Rahab’s treason, or Cyrus’ edict, being on the side of God or God’s people is enough.

And when you think about it, that’s grace. That’s God’s undeserved favor upon the sinner.

I’m hearing evangelicals saying that Donald Trump is like this. He’s a modern-day King Cyrus or Queen Esther, having been placed in a position of authority “for such a time as this” to speak up for God’s people and fulfil God’s plans for America.

But where it’s hard to see God’s grace at work is in the lives of Whitefield’s slaves or Martin Luther King’s sexual conquests. Or the victims of the avarice of megachurch pastors.

It’s one thing to say God’s grace was at work through Dr King or President Trump despite their crimes and indiscretions, but what of God’s grace for those immigrant children separated from their parents at the border, or for Muslim refugees lost in diplomatic limbo, or for chronically ill children unable to access government medical benefits? Where is God’s grace for the victims of Mr Trump’s sexual appetites?

God’s grace, like rain, falls on the just and the unjust alike. But let us not be so focused on finding that grace in the lives of sinful leaders, that we can’t find it and demonstrate it in the broken lives of the enslaved, the asylum seeker, the rape victim, the poor and the outcast.

Share to:

Subscribe to my blog

Disclaimer

The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the official views of Morling College or its affiliates and partners.

Latest Blogs

If Jesus Ran a Dinner Church, Part II

In my previous post I began looking at all the meals Jesus attended in Luke’s Gospel with a view to distilling some ‘rules’ for dinner

If Jesus Ran a Dinner Church, Part I

Dinner churches are increasing in popularity as many Christians find themselves drawn to a church experience that is more informal, communal, egalitarian, and one that

Purists and Pragmatists Unite!

In Stanley Tucci’s cult film, Big Night, two Italian immigrant brothers from Abruzzo own a restaurant called Paradise, situated on the New Jersey Shore in

The Gospel According to Squid Game

In a previous post I reflected on the awful depiction of a Korean pastor as one of the contestants in Netflix’s mega-hit Squid Game. In

12 thoughts on “When Good Things Happen Through Bad People

  1. You mentioned someone who continued ministering even through loss of faith. Who was that?

    As a minister myself I hear from a lot of my colleagues statements that lead me to think it’s a common thing among certain groups/brands of church leaders for a lack of faith to not be a concern at all! I’m dumbstruck that anyone can continue in ministry whilst not believing the things they are teaching! Genuine questions and doubts arise, of course; Lord help me in my unbelief, but to be genuinely freed from faith in Christ’s resurrection and ascension is a fatal flaw to my thinking.

  2. Wonderful article Mike. It must have been hard to write this with the balance with which you have done so. It just goes to show that none of us has the right to judge anyone else. Where sin abounds, grace abounds all the more. Grace is outrageous and offensive and we often can’t accept it when we have sinned ourselves (speaking for myself!).

    I’m amazed that God uses even me, but he continues to give me gifts that I haven’t even asked for, and despite any bad things I’ve done.

    Thanks also for the reminder to see God’s grace in not just leaders who have sinned, but the poor and outcast etc.

  3. A well balanced article indeed Mike.

    However, I was a little surprised to see Queen Esther listed as sinning – I thought she had no choice in the matter of pleasing the king!

    1. I concede that point. I guess I was getting at her complicity in an unjust system, but you’re right that she probably had very little agency in the matter.

      1. Just good quality stuff all round. Loved it. And this comment by Merv and then your comment back. I’m loving it all.

  4. Fantastic article Mike! Thanks.

  5. Mike

    I really struggled with this article.

    I know it is solid theology but but but…

    As I read something within me screams at the injustice that occurs in such situations where powerful Christians dehumanise others while being acclaimed in positions of status and power. I won’t call them followers of Jesus because it seems to me that is not who they are.

    Genesis 1-11 compared with other Ancient Near East creation narratives challenges us to never be dehumanising status seekers.

    And it goes on and on through church history. status and position are sought and victims lie scattered around.

    Christendom has left countless victims scattered and we continue to see this.

    And with Imperialism and the Industrial Revolution continuing hand in glove, China now leads the West in dehumanising work and exploitation which feeds our “Consumer Gods” and we are pretty silent. We critique China but do not understand in feeding their avarice we are them. We do not ask people to consider what they buy.

    That avarice trend along with Climate Change wars are leaving so many more victims with Christian persons in power positions so blind to what is happening.

    Climate Change already is mocking our -the church’s – preparedness to be silent in the pulpit about where the greed for status, position and stuff leads us. To use a metaphor from Proverbs we are like pigs being led by a rope through a ring in our nostrils.

    Sorry to rave on Mike but as part of the pietist tradition I wonder what it means to follow “in the way of Jesus” putting off the “old Person” and putting on the “new Person” in the face of the Christian Church leaving victims all over the public Square.

    Incarnation, Jesus Baptism and Temptation, his Miracles and Kingdom Parables, his Temple Cleansing, his Crucifixion, Resurrection, Ascension and Pentecost herald a new hinge in history where we are to follow in the way of the last Adam who gives the life giving Spirit.

    So while I admit your blog reflects theology that is true I scream out against such theology removed from the larger Gospel narrative for Jesus leads us into life in a cruciform shaped community living out what New Creation looks like.

    Thanks for blogging – you and Hauerwas always make me think .

    1. As Mary said, you always make me think. But never more than in this article. I squirm to admit that I agree. I don’t want to … but I have to. As grace grows in me more and more with time, this type of challenge to my gospel understanding finds a deeper place within. How great is God. Thank you Mike … very much. You’re a straight shooter.

    2. Me too Mary. I’m having a hard time with this.

  6. Michael and et al
    As I read this blog i find comfort in sharing these views. As it regards the question. does God give good things to bad people ? i have a reccomendation. i’m currently reading Peter Enns’ new book “How the Bible Actually Works”. for those who read this i suspect you will love or hate it i’ll let you find out why. But for me it was , dare I say life changing? well maybe but for sure it has taken me to a new level of Biblical understanding

  7. God once used a donkey to do his will. And he sent a prophetic word through the high priest who was heading up the kangaroo court that convicted Jesus. The prophets say that God sent King Nebuchadnezzar to conquer God’s people. God can and might use anyone.
    That is not to say that the sinful person used by God will somehow “get away with it”. Jesus did say that anyone who causes a little child to stumble (ahem, slaveholders and also those separating families) would be better off with a millstone around their neck, at the bottom of the sea. Back when I was a kid, people used to say “Life is short; eternity is long.”
    That’s the only way that I can try to make sense of this kind of conundrum. If God waited to use perfect people, he wouldn’t find anyone. On the other hand, God doesn’t overlook the harm done to “the least of these.” We will all give an account, for both the good and the bad that we’ve done. And there is coming a day when God will right every wrong and dry every tear, including those caused by people who claimed to be acting in his name.
    Maybe more than anything this is a reminder not to hero worship or to hate people, as though they are either all good or all bad.

  8. I want to say that you’re exaggerating, that you’re tarnishing the reputations of great leaders, but even my own experience teaches me that God uses “ungodly” people. Maybe the highest good is to honour God and “hallow” his name, despite our human frailty or even grotesque sin. The one who was justified in the temple was the tax collector who could only cry, “Have mercy on me, a sinner”. A profound paradox is that the sovereign, holy God uses those who make themselves available to achieve his purposes, despite their “unworthiness”. That gives me hope.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *